Go to The Journal of Clinical Investigation
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Journal stats
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
  • Physician-Scientist Development
  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • By specialty
    • COVID-19
    • Cardiology
    • Immunology
    • Metabolism
    • Nephrology
    • Oncology
    • Pulmonology
    • All ...
  • Videos
  • Collections
    • In-Press Preview
    • Resource and Technical Advances
    • Clinical Research and Public Health
    • Research Letters
    • Editorials
    • Perspectives
    • Physician-Scientist Development
    • Reviews
    • Top read articles

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Specialties
  • In-Press Preview
  • Resource and Technical Advances
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Research Letters
  • Editorials
  • Perspectives
  • Physician-Scientist Development
  • Reviews
  • Top read articles
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Journal stats
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
PDX-derived organoids model in vivo drug response and secrete biomarkers
Ling Huang, Bruno Bockorny, Indranil Paul, Dipikaa Akshinthala, Pierre-Oliver Frappart, Omar Gandarilla, Arindam Bose, Veronica Sanchez-Gonzalez, Emily E. Rouse, Sylvain D. Lehoux, Nicole Pandell, Christine M. Lim, John G. Clohessy, Joseph Grossman, Raul Gonzalez, Sofia Perea Del Pino, George Daaboul, Mandeep S. Sawhney, Steven D. Freedman, Alexander Kleger, Richard D. Cummings, Andrew Emili, Lakshmi B. Muthuswamy, Manuel Hidalgo, Senthil K. Muthuswamy
Ling Huang, Bruno Bockorny, Indranil Paul, Dipikaa Akshinthala, Pierre-Oliver Frappart, Omar Gandarilla, Arindam Bose, Veronica Sanchez-Gonzalez, Emily E. Rouse, Sylvain D. Lehoux, Nicole Pandell, Christine M. Lim, John G. Clohessy, Joseph Grossman, Raul Gonzalez, Sofia Perea Del Pino, George Daaboul, Mandeep S. Sawhney, Steven D. Freedman, Alexander Kleger, Richard D. Cummings, Andrew Emili, Lakshmi B. Muthuswamy, Manuel Hidalgo, Senthil K. Muthuswamy
View: Text | PDF
Resource and Technical Advance Oncology

PDX-derived organoids model in vivo drug response and secrete biomarkers

  • Text
  • PDF
Abstract

Patient-derived organoid models are proving to be a powerful platform for both basic and translational studies. Here we conduct a methodical analysis of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) tumor organoid drug response in paired patient-derived xenograft (PDX) and PDX-derived organoid (PXO) models grown under WNT-free culture conditions. We report a specific relationship between area under the curve value of organoid drug dose response and in vivo tumor growth, irrespective of the drug treatment. In addition, we analyzed the glycome of PDX and PXO models and demonstrate that PXOs recapitulate the in vivo glycan landscape. In addition, we identify a core set of 57 N-glycans detected in all 10 models that represent 50%–94% of the relative abundance of all N-glycans detected in each of the models. Last, we developed a secreted biomarker discovery pipeline using media supernatant of organoid cultures and identified potentially new extracellular vesicle (EV) protein markers. We validated our findings using plasma samples from patients with PDAC, benign gastrointestinal diseases, and chronic pancreatitis and discovered that 4 EV proteins are potential circulating biomarkers for PDAC. Thus, we demonstrate the utility of organoid cultures to not only model in vivo drug responses but also serve as a powerful platform for discovering clinically actionable serologic biomarkers.

Authors

Ling Huang, Bruno Bockorny, Indranil Paul, Dipikaa Akshinthala, Pierre-Oliver Frappart, Omar Gandarilla, Arindam Bose, Veronica Sanchez-Gonzalez, Emily E. Rouse, Sylvain D. Lehoux, Nicole Pandell, Christine M. Lim, John G. Clohessy, Joseph Grossman, Raul Gonzalez, Sofia Perea Del Pino, George Daaboul, Mandeep S. Sawhney, Steven D. Freedman, Alexander Kleger, Richard D. Cummings, Andrew Emili, Lakshmi B. Muthuswamy, Manuel Hidalgo, Senthil K. Muthuswamy

×

Figure 6

Comparison of N-glycan subtypes and abundance in PXO and PDX.

Options: View larger image (or click on image) Download as PowerPoint
Comparison of N-glycan subtypes and abundance in PXO and PDX.
(A) Major ...
(A) Major N-glycan classes and their occurrence in all PXO and matched PDX models analyzed. The y axis identifies the different classes of glycans, the numbers represent numbers of N-glycan in each class, and the x axis shows percentage of glycans with different distribution patterns. Paired, glycans identified in both matched PDX and PXO models; discordant, glycans identified in PDX and PXO from different tumors; PDX only, glycans identified only in PDX tumors; PXO only, glycans identified only in PXO. (B) Average relative abundance of 3 major N-glycan classes in PDX and PXO models; mean values and 95% confidence interval are indicated. (C) Numbers on y axis refer to numbers of the subgroups corresponding to varying degrees of sialylation or fucosylation, and x axis shows percentage of glycans with different distribution patterns. Chart format is the same as in A. (D) Relative abundance of the 57 common N-glycans in PDX or PXO samples. Colored dots indicate abundance of glycans in each class. Red, high mannose; green, pauci-mannose; blue, hybrid; purple, complex. (E) Distribution of top N-glycans in PXO. H, hexose; F, fucose; N, N-acetylglucosamine. Mean values and 95% confidence interval range are shown.

Copyright © 2026 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN 2379-3708

Sign up for email alerts