Go to The Journal of Clinical Investigation
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Journal stats
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
  • Physician-Scientist Development
  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • By specialty
    • COVID-19
    • Cardiology
    • Immunology
    • Metabolism
    • Nephrology
    • Oncology
    • Pulmonology
    • All ...
  • Videos
  • Collections
    • In-Press Preview
    • Resource and Technical Advances
    • Clinical Research and Public Health
    • Research Letters
    • Editorials
    • Perspectives
    • Physician-Scientist Development
    • Reviews
    • Top read articles

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Specialties
  • In-Press Preview
  • Resource and Technical Advances
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Research Letters
  • Editorials
  • Perspectives
  • Physician-Scientist Development
  • Reviews
  • Top read articles
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Journal stats
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
Tumor treating fields suppress tumor cell growth and neurologic decline in models of spinal metastases
Daniel Ledbetter, Romulo Augusto Andrade de Almeida, Xizi Wu, Ariel Naveh, Chirag B. Patel, Queena Gonzalez, Thomas H. Beckham, Robert North, Laurence Rhines, Jing Li, Amol Ghia, David Aten, Claudio Tatsui, Christopher Alvarez-Breckenridge
Daniel Ledbetter, Romulo Augusto Andrade de Almeida, Xizi Wu, Ariel Naveh, Chirag B. Patel, Queena Gonzalez, Thomas H. Beckham, Robert North, Laurence Rhines, Jing Li, Amol Ghia, David Aten, Claudio Tatsui, Christopher Alvarez-Breckenridge
View: Text | PDF
Resource and Technical Advance Bone biology Neuroscience

Tumor treating fields suppress tumor cell growth and neurologic decline in models of spinal metastases

  • Text
  • PDF
Abstract

Spinal metastases can result in severe neurologic compromise and decreased overall survival. Despite treatment advances, local disease progression is frequent, highlighting the need for novel therapies. Tumor treating fields (TTFields) impair tumor cell replication and are influenced by properties of surrounding tissue. We hypothesized that bone’s dielectric properties will enhance TTFields-mediated suppression of tumor growth in spinal metastasis models. Computational modeling of TTFields intensity was performed following surgical resection of a spinal metastasis and demonstrated enhanced TTFields intensity within the resected vertebral body. Additionally, luciferase-tagged human KRIB osteosarcoma and A549 lung adenocarcinoma cell lines were cultured in demineralized bone grafts and exposed to TTFields. Following TTFields exposure, the bioluminescence imaging (BLI) signal decreased to 10%–80% of baseline, while control cultures displayed a 4.48- to 9.36-fold increase in signal. Lastly, TTFields were applied in an orthotopic murine model of spinal metastasis. After 21 days of treatment, control mice demonstrated a 5-fold increase in BLI signal compared with TTFields-treated mice. TTFields similarly prevented tumor invasion into the spinal canal and development of neurologic symptoms. Our data suggest that TTFields can be leveraged as a local therapy within minimally conductive bone of spinal metastases. This provides the groundwork for future studies investigating TTFields for patients with treatment-refractory spinal metastases.

Authors

Daniel Ledbetter, Romulo Augusto Andrade de Almeida, Xizi Wu, Ariel Naveh, Chirag B. Patel, Queena Gonzalez, Thomas H. Beckham, Robert North, Laurence Rhines, Jing Li, Amol Ghia, David Aten, Claudio Tatsui, Christopher Alvarez-Breckenridge

×

Figure 5

Effects of 150 kHz TTFields versus control (heat) on neurologic functional status milestones in mice bearing spinal tumors.

Options: View larger image (or click on image) Download as PowerPoint
Effects of 150 kHz TTFields versus control (heat) on neurologic function...
Mice demonstrating normal posture (A) and progressive paralysis milestones of tail drop (B), dorsal stepping (C), hind limb sweeping (D and E), and hind limb paralysis (F). Control mice displayed a median time-to-tail drop of 17 postoperative days and all others experienced tail drop by 20 days after implantation, whereas 53% of TTFields-exposed mice displayed symptoms on day 33 and the other 47% remained symptom free (G). Control mice had a median time-to–dorsal stepping of 25 days, while 2 of 15 TTFields-exposed mice displayed dorsal stepping over the observation period (on days 27 and 33) (H). Control mice had median time-to–hind limb sweeping at 31.5 days and median time-to–bilateral hind limb paralysis at 35.5 days; in contrast, no TTFields-exposed mice progressed to either of these milestones by the end of the observation period (I and J). Statistical comparison of asymptomatic fractions performed using log-rank (Mantel-Cox) test (n = 5 treated animals and 3 control animals, per experiment).

Copyright © 2026 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN 2379-3708

Sign up for email alerts