BACKGROUND Cancer accounts for over 20% of late posttransplant mortality, yet the contribution of genetic susceptibility to posttransplant cancer risk remains unclear. This study investigates germline genetic risk factors for posttransplant cancer in the Finnish population using data from the FinnGen cohort.METHODS A pan-cancer polygenic risk score (PRS) was constructed using genetic variants identified in UK and US populations to assess the influence of common germline variants on time to first cancer diagnosis in 1,802 Finnish kidney transplant recipients (KTRs), of whom 317 developed posttransplant cancer. The PRS was first validated in the FinnGen non-transplantation cohort and subsequently applied to KTRs, with replication in lung and liver transplant recipients (n = 476). Functional relevance was explored by assessing associations between the PRS and expression levels of 2,923 plasma proteins in the UK Biobank (n = 53,013).RESULTS Compared with a matched non-transplantation cohort (n = 68,294), KTRs exhibited earlier cancer onset. The PRS was significantly associated with time to first cancer diagnosis in the non-transplantation population (HR 1.04, 95% CI 1.038–1.056, P = 3.75 × 10–25). Among KTRs younger than 40 years, higher PRS was associated with earlier cancer onset (HR 1.08, 95% CI 1.01–1.17, P = 0.036), indicating a stronger genetic effect at younger ages. The PRS significantly (Bonferroni < 0.05) altered the regulation of 87 plasma proteins, several of which were known cancer-related markers.CONCLUSION Inherited genetic predisposition, captured by pan-cancer PRS, may contribute to individual susceptibility to cancer after solid organ transplantation, particularly at younger ages.FUNDING State research funding (Helsinki and Uusimaa Health District), the Foundation for Pediatric Research, and the Sigrid Jusèlius Foundation.
Jarmo Ritari, Kati Hyvärinen, Kirsi Jahnukainen, FinnGen Consortium, Jukka Partanen, Ilkka Helanterä, Timo Jahnukainen
Usage data is cumulative from April 2026 through June 2026.
| Usage | JCI | PMC |
|---|---|---|
| Text version | 992 | 0 |
| 336 | 0 | |
| Figure | 170 | 0 |
| Table | 24 | 0 |
| Supplemental data | 173 | 0 |
| Citation downloads | 247 | 0 |
| Totals | 1,942 | 0 |
| Total Views | 1,942 | |
Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.
Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.