Go to The Journal of Clinical Investigation
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
  • Physician-Scientist Development
  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • By specialty
    • COVID-19
    • Cardiology
    • Immunology
    • Metabolism
    • Nephrology
    • Oncology
    • Pulmonology
    • All ...
  • Videos
  • Collections
    • In-Press Preview
    • Resource and Technical Advances
    • Clinical Research and Public Health
    • Research Letters
    • Editorials
    • Perspectives
    • Physician-Scientist Development
    • Reviews
    • Top read articles

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Specialties
  • In-Press Preview
  • Resource and Technical Advances
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Research Letters
  • Editorials
  • Perspectives
  • Physician-Scientist Development
  • Reviews
  • Top read articles
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
Residency matches of MD-PhD versus MD-only students: compatibility with continued research momentum
Shannon Baker, S. Mehdi Nouraie, Richard A. Steinman
Shannon Baker, S. Mehdi Nouraie, Richard A. Steinman
View: Text | PDF
Physician-Scientist Development

Residency matches of MD-PhD versus MD-only students: compatibility with continued research momentum

  • Text
  • PDF
Abstract

Programs at the medical school level to train students as physician-scientists include NIH-supported MD-PhD (Medical Scientist Training Program, MSTP), non–NIH-supported MD-PhD (MDPhD), and limited research pathways for MD-only students. Continued exposure to a research-rich culture in residency could sustain commitment to a physician-scientist career. We compared residency matches of 10,668 MSTP, MDPhD, or MD-only students from 2021–2023 match cycles, using the NIH funding level of the matched residency program’s department in the match year as the central measure. We also measured how medical school NIH funding levels influenced student matches to top-funded residency programs. Public individual-level match data were available from 13 top-NIH-funded medical schools (top quintile, highest 20% funding) and 8 mid-NIH-funded medical schools (mid quintile, 40%–60% funding). Top-quintile medical schools housed only MSTP programs, whereas mid-quintile schools had both MSTP and MDPhD programs. Across all medical schools, MSTP students matched at a higher rate than MD-only students to residencies in top-NIH-funded departments in their discipline. Within the mid-quintile schools, MSTP and MDPhD student matches did not differ significantly. Notably, students from the top-quintile medical schools (both MD-only and MSTP) matched to higher-NIH-funded residency departments than comparably trained students from the mid-quintile schools.

Authors

Shannon Baker, S. Mehdi Nouraie, Richard A. Steinman

×

Figure 4

Matches by medical school and training background to top 10% of residencies.

Options: View larger image (or click on image) Download as PowerPoint
Matches by medical school and training background to top 10% of residenc...
(A) Each dot is a medical school with the fraction of its students who matched to top-10th-percentile NIH-funded residencies denoted for each of 3 match cycles. The bars represent the average fraction matching at this level across all of the medical schools during each of 3 match cycles. Standard deviation is shown as red bars. Results are divided by training level and by the funding quintile of the medical school that the students attended. (B) Each dot represents a single school’s fraction of students matching to top-10th-percentile NIH-funded residencies, averaged over 3 match cycles (2021–2023) for each school. The lines connects each medical school’s outcome for the indicated training groups. Significance between training program and between quintiles were modeled based on a binary outcome of acceptance to the top 10% of funded residencies or not and is shown in Table 4.

Copyright © 2026 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN 2379-3708

Sign up for email alerts