Submit a comment
Abstract
BACKGROUND Clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) with pancreatic metastases (PM) is paradoxically associated with prolonged overall survival (OS), but the biological basis for this observation remains unclear.METHODS We analyzed matched primary and metastatic samples from an international consortium of patients with PM (n = 108) and compared them with a previously characterized ccRCC cohort without PM (n = 273).RESULTS Primary ccRCC tumors associated with PM were dominated by indolent, angiogenic phenotypes, characterized by low-grade histology and reduced mTORC1 activation (all P < 0.001). Tumors of patients with PM were often PBRM1-deficient (80.4% vs. 54.8%, P < 0.001) and rarely harbored BAP1 loss (3.7% vs. 20.7%, P < 0.001). After metastasis diagnosis, patients with PM had significantly longer median OS compared with those without PM (110 vs. 33 months, HR 0.28 [95% CI, 0.19–0.39], P < 0.001). Survival was further prolonged among patients with PBRM1 loss (143 vs. 64 months, HR 0.41 [95% CI, 0.22–0.81], P = 0.008). Notably, PM lesions were typically low-grade and PBRM1-deficient even when more aggressive and evolved clones were present in primary tumors. Finally, PBRM1 loss was associated with preferential response to angiogenesis inhibitors over immune-oncology therapy, reflected by longer time on treatment (32.1 vs. 9.1 months, HR 0.16 [95% CI, 0.06–0.39], P < 0.001).CONCLUSION These findings illustrate selective tropism of indolent, less-evolved, PBRM1-deficient ccRCC clones for pancreatic dissemination. This biological bias likely underlies therapeutic sensitivity and favorable survival, supporting the consideration of PBRM1 status and metastatic tropism in risk stratification and treatment selection.FUNDING NIH Kidney Cancer SPORE grant (P50CA196516); The Cancer Prevention and Research Institute of Texas (RP220294); Endowment from Jan and Bob Pickens Distinguished Professorship in Medical Science and Brock Fund for Medical Science Chair in Pathology.
Authors
Haitao Xu, Payal Kapur, Alana Christie, Aleksandra W. Nielsen, Averi Perny, Olivia Brandenburg, Charlotte Small, Jeffrey Miyata, Hua Zhong, Courtney Roberts, Roy Elias, Vanina Tcheuyap, Cassandra Duarte, Adrie van Bokhoven, Justine Panian, Haoran Li, Katharine A Collier, Debra Zynger, Luis Meza, Benoit Beuselinck, Neeraj Agarwal, Amir Mortazavi, Sumanta Pal, Rana McKay, Elaine T. Lam, Satwik Rajaram, James Brugarolas
Guidelines
The Editorial Board will only consider comments that are deemed relevant and of interest to readers. The Journal will not post data that have not been subjected to peer review; or a comment that is essentially a reiteration of another comment.
- Comments appear on the Journal’s website and are linked from the original article’s web page.
- Authors are notified by email if their comments are posted.
- The Journal reserves the right to edit comments for length and clarity.
- No appeals will be considered.
- Comments are not indexed in PubMed.
Specific requirements
- Maximum length, 400 words
- Entered as plain text or HTML
- Author’s name and email address, to be posted with the comment
- Declaration of all potential conflicts of interest (even if these are not ultimately posted); see the Journal’s conflict-of-interest policy
- Comments may not include figures
