Go to The Journal of Clinical Investigation
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Journal stats
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
  • Physician-Scientist Development
  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • By specialty
    • COVID-19
    • Cardiology
    • Immunology
    • Metabolism
    • Nephrology
    • Oncology
    • Pulmonology
    • All ...
  • Videos
  • Collections
    • In-Press Preview
    • Resource and Technical Advances
    • Clinical Research and Public Health
    • Research Letters
    • Editorials
    • Perspectives
    • Physician-Scientist Development
    • Reviews
    • Top read articles

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Specialties
  • In-Press Preview
  • Resource and Technical Advances
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Research Letters
  • Editorials
  • Perspectives
  • Physician-Scientist Development
  • Reviews
  • Top read articles
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Journal stats
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
CD226 opposes TIGIT to disrupt Tregs in melanoma
Julien Fourcade, Zhaojun Sun, Joe-Marc Chauvin, Mignane Ka, Diwakar Davar, Ornella Pagliano, Hong Wang, Sofiane Saada, Carmine Menna, Rada Amin, Cindy Sander, John M. Kirkwood, Alan J. Korman, Hassane M. Zarour
Julien Fourcade, Zhaojun Sun, Joe-Marc Chauvin, Mignane Ka, Diwakar Davar, Ornella Pagliano, Hong Wang, Sofiane Saada, Carmine Menna, Rada Amin, Cindy Sander, John M. Kirkwood, Alan J. Korman, Hassane M. Zarour
View: Text | PDF
Research Article Immunology Oncology

CD226 opposes TIGIT to disrupt Tregs in melanoma

  • Text
  • PDF
Abstract

CD4+ Tregs impede T cell responses to tumors. They express multiple inhibitory receptors that support their suppressive functions, including T cell Ig and ITIM domain (TIGIT). In melanoma patients, we show that Tregs exhibit increased TIGIT expression and decreased expression of its competing costimulatory receptor CD226 as compared with CD4+ effector T cells, resulting in an increased TIGIT/CD226 ratio. Tregs failed to upregulate CD226 upon T cell activation. TIGIT+ Tregs are highly suppressive, stable, and enriched in tumors. TIGIT and CD226 oppose each other to augment or disrupt, respectively, Treg suppression and stability. A high TIGIT/CD226 ratio in Tregs correlates with increased Treg frequencies in tumors and poor clinical outcome upon immune checkpoint blockade. Altogether, our findings show that a high TIGIT/CD226 ratio in Tregs regulates their suppressive function and stability in melanoma. They provide the rationale for novel immunotherapies to activate CD226 in Tregs together with TIGIT blockade to counteract Treg suppression in cancer patients.

Authors

Julien Fourcade, Zhaojun Sun, Joe-Marc Chauvin, Mignane Ka, Diwakar Davar, Ornella Pagliano, Hong Wang, Sofiane Saada, Carmine Menna, Rada Amin, Cindy Sander, John M. Kirkwood, Alan J. Korman, Hassane M. Zarour

×

Figure 4

PVR regulates Treg suppression in melanoma through TIGIT and CD226.

Options: View larger image (or click on image) Download as PowerPoint
PVR regulates Treg suppression in melanoma through TIGIT and CD226.
(A a...
(A and B) Flow cytometric analysis from 1 representative experiment showing the percentages of CFSElo proliferating responder CD8+ T cells (A) and summary data showing the suppression of responder CD8+ T cell proliferation (B) after a 6-day in vitro stimulation (IVS) with autologous antigen-presenting cells (APCs) and anti-CD3 mAbs in the absence or presence of TIGIT+CD25hiCD127–CD4+ Tregs isolated from PBMCs of melanoma patients (MPs) and with PVR-Fc and/or anti-TIGIT and/or anti-CD226-blocking mAbs and/or IgG control mAbs. Ratios of Tregs to responder cells are indicated. CD4+ Tregs were used either untouched (A and B, top; n = 10) or were separately preincubated with anti-CD226 mAbs (aCD226/TIGIT+ Tregs) before thorough washing and plating into wells (B, bottom; n = 8). (C and D) Flow cytometric analysis from 1 representative experiment (C) and summary data (D) showing the suppression of responder CD8+ T cell proliferation after a 6-day IVS, as in A and B, but in the presence or absence of CD25hiCD127– Tregs or CD25–CD4+ T effector cells (Teffs) isolated from metastatic melanoma (MM) tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs). n = 15. Results represent the mean of independent experiments. Horizontal bars depict mean values. Error bars indicate SEM. P values were obtained by repeated-measures ANOVA followed by Tukey’s test. *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001.

Copyright © 2026 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN 2379-3708

Sign up for email alerts