Go to The Journal of Clinical Investigation
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Journal stats
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
  • Physician-Scientist Development
  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • By specialty
    • COVID-19
    • Cardiology
    • Immunology
    • Metabolism
    • Nephrology
    • Oncology
    • Pulmonology
    • All ...
  • Videos
  • Collections
    • In-Press Preview
    • Resource and Technical Advances
    • Clinical Research and Public Health
    • Research Letters
    • Editorials
    • Perspectives
    • Physician-Scientist Development
    • Reviews
    • Top read articles

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Specialties
  • In-Press Preview
  • Resource and Technical Advances
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Research Letters
  • Editorials
  • Perspectives
  • Physician-Scientist Development
  • Reviews
  • Top read articles
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Journal stats
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
IL-6–targeted therapies to block the cytokine or its receptor drive distinct alterations in T cell function
Cate Speake, Tania Habib, Katharina Lambert, Christian Hundhausen, Sandra Lord, Matthew J. Dufort, Samuel O. Skinner, Alex Hu, MacKenzie Kinsman, Britta E. Jones, Megan D. Maerz, Megan Tatum, Anne M. Hocking, Gerald T. Nepom, Carla J. Greenbaum, Jane H. Buckner
Cate Speake, Tania Habib, Katharina Lambert, Christian Hundhausen, Sandra Lord, Matthew J. Dufort, Samuel O. Skinner, Alex Hu, MacKenzie Kinsman, Britta E. Jones, Megan D. Maerz, Megan Tatum, Anne M. Hocking, Gerald T. Nepom, Carla J. Greenbaum, Jane H. Buckner
View: Text | PDF
Research Article Immunology

IL-6–targeted therapies to block the cytokine or its receptor drive distinct alterations in T cell function

  • Text
  • PDF
Abstract

Therapeutics that inhibit IL-6 at different points in its signaling pathway are in clinical use, yet whether the immunological effects of these interventions differ based on their molecular target is unknown. We performed short-term interventions in individuals with type 1 diabetes using anti–IL-6 (siltuximab) or anti–IL-6 receptor (IL-6R; tocilizumab) therapies and investigated the impact of this in vivo blockade on T cell fate and function. Immune outcomes were influenced by the target of the therapeutic intervention (IL-6 versus IL-6R) and by peak drug concentration. Tocilizumab reduced ICOS expression on T follicular helper cell populations and T cell receptor–driven (TCR-driven) STAT3 phosphorylation. Siltuximab reversed resistance to Treg-mediated suppression and increased TCR-driven phosphorylated STAT3 and production of IL-10, IL-21, and IL-27 by T effectors. Together, these findings indicate that the context of IL-6 blockade in vivo drives distinct T cell–intrinsic changes that may influence therapeutic outcomes.

Authors

Cate Speake, Tania Habib, Katharina Lambert, Christian Hundhausen, Sandra Lord, Matthew J. Dufort, Samuel O. Skinner, Alex Hu, MacKenzie Kinsman, Britta E. Jones, Megan D. Maerz, Megan Tatum, Anne M. Hocking, Gerald T. Nepom, Carla J. Greenbaum, Jane H. Buckner

×

Figure 3

Siltuximab but not tocilizumab reverses Teff resistance to Treg-mediated suppression.

Options: View larger image (or click on image) Download as PowerPoint
Siltuximab but not tocilizumab reverses Teff resistance to Treg-mediated...
Expanded allogeneic Tregs from a healthy control donor were cocultured at a ratio of 1:4 with Teffs from either siltuximab-treated or tocilizumab-treated patients with T1D in the presence of anti-CD3/anti-CD28–coated beads for 2 days. The percentage of suppression was determined by measuring the frequency of activated CD25+CD134+ Teffs. Each line represents an individual patient; n = 10 for siltuximab and n = 9 for tocilizumab. (A) Percentage suppression for siltuximab-treated patients and tocilizumab-treated patients. (B) Linear regression for siltuximab cohort showing positive correlation between peak drug concentration on d1 and percentage suppression at d14. (C) Percentage suppression for cohort that participated in both studies (n = 5); note these individuals are also included in A and B. Statistical tests: (A and C) Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed-rank test; (B) linear regression.

Copyright © 2026 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN 2379-3708

Sign up for email alerts