Go to The Journal of Clinical Investigation
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Journal stats
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
  • Physician-Scientist Development
  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • By specialty
    • COVID-19
    • Cardiology
    • Immunology
    • Metabolism
    • Nephrology
    • Oncology
    • Pulmonology
    • All ...
  • Videos
  • Collections
    • In-Press Preview
    • Resource and Technical Advances
    • Clinical Research and Public Health
    • Research Letters
    • Editorials
    • Perspectives
    • Physician-Scientist Development
    • Reviews
    • Top read articles

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Specialties
  • In-Press Preview
  • Resource and Technical Advances
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Research Letters
  • Editorials
  • Perspectives
  • Physician-Scientist Development
  • Reviews
  • Top read articles
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Journal stats
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
The EMT factor ZEB1 paradoxically inhibits EMT in BRAF-mutant carcinomas
Ester Sánchez-Tilló, Leire Pedrosa, Ingrid Vila, Yongxu Chen, Balázs Győrffy, Lidia Sánchez-Moral, Laura Siles, Juan J. Lozano, Anna Esteve-Codina, Douglas S. Darling, Miriam Cuatrecasas, Antoni Castells, Joan Maurel, Antonio Postigo
Ester Sánchez-Tilló, Leire Pedrosa, Ingrid Vila, Yongxu Chen, Balázs Győrffy, Lidia Sánchez-Moral, Laura Siles, Juan J. Lozano, Anna Esteve-Codina, Douglas S. Darling, Miriam Cuatrecasas, Antoni Castells, Joan Maurel, Antonio Postigo
View: Text | PDF
Research Article Gastroenterology Oncology

The EMT factor ZEB1 paradoxically inhibits EMT in BRAF-mutant carcinomas

  • Text
  • PDF
Abstract

Despite being in the same pathway, mutations of KRAS and BRAF in colorectal carcinomas (CRCs) determine distinct progression courses. ZEB1 induces an epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT) and is associated with worse progression in most carcinomas. Using samples from patients with CRC, mouse models of KrasG12D and BrafV600E CRC, and a Zeb1-deficient mouse, we show that ZEB1 had opposite functions in KRAS- and BRAF-mutant CRCs. In KrasG12D CRCs, ZEB1 was correlated with a worse prognosis and a higher number of larger and undifferentiated (mesenchymal or EMT-like) tumors. Surprisingly, in BrafV600E CRC, ZEB1 was associated with better prognosis; fewer, smaller, and more differentiated (reduced EMT) primary tumors; and fewer metastases. ZEB1 was positively correlated in KRAS-mutant CRC cells and negatively in BRAF-mutant CRC cells with gene signatures for EMT, cell proliferation and survival, and ERK signaling. On a mechanistic level, ZEB1 knockdown in KRAS-mutant CRC cells increased apoptosis and reduced clonogenicity and anchorage-independent growth; the reverse occurred in BRAFV600E CRC cells. ZEB1 is associated with better prognosis and reduced EMT signature in patients harboring BRAF CRCs. These data suggest that ZEB1 can function as a tumor suppressor in BRAF-mutant CRCs, highlighting the importance of considering the KRAS/BRAF mutational background of CRCs in therapeutic strategies targeting ZEB1/EMT.

Authors

Ester Sánchez-Tilló, Leire Pedrosa, Ingrid Vila, Yongxu Chen, Balázs Győrffy, Lidia Sánchez-Moral, Laura Siles, Juan J. Lozano, Anna Esteve-Codina, Douglas S. Darling, Miriam Cuatrecasas, Antoni Castells, Joan Maurel, Antonio Postigo

×

Figure 4

KRAS and BRAF induce ZEB1 through ERK- and AKT-dependent mechanisms.

Options: View larger image (or click on image) Download as PowerPoint

KRAS and BRAF induce ZEB1 through ERK- and AKT-dependent mechanisms.
(A...
(A) ZEB1 and CDH1 mRNA in KRAS (LS174T) and BRAF (RKO)-mutant CRC cells were quantified by qRT-PCR using GAPDH as a reference gene. Bars represent the mean with the SD of at least 3 independent experiments. (B) ZEB1 mRNA expression in mutant (mut) KRAS and BRAF CRC cells interfered with a nontargeting siRNA (CTL) or with specific siRNAs against KRAS (KRAS KD), BRAF (BRAF KD), or ZEB1 (ZEB1 KD). Dunnett’s comparison test was used. ZEB1, ERK, KRAS, and BRAF proteins were analyzed by Western blot. (C) ZEB1, KRAS, and BRAF proteins were analyzed by Western blot in cell lysates of KRAS- and BRAF-mutant CRC cells overexpressed with lentiviral vectors for KRASG12D and BRAFV600E or an empty control vector (Vect). Α-Tubulin (α-tub) was included as a loading control. (D) Lysates from KRAS- and BRAF-mutant CRC cells incubated with PD98059 (PD), LY294002 (LY), or with their solvent (Untr) were immunoblotted for ZEB1 along with GAPDH as control of equal loading. (E) Left: Expression of pAKT and total AKT in KRAS-mutant and BRAF-mutant CRC cells interfered with either siCtl (CLT) or with a siRNA against ZEB1 (ZEB1 KD). Right: As in the left panel but for pERK and total ERK. (F) As in A, but for relative expression levels of ZEB1, ZEB2, SNAI1, and TWIST mRNA expression in KRAS-mutant and BRAF-mutant CRC cells stably interfered with lentivirus against ZEB1 KD (red bar) and compared with cells interfered with by a control vector (CTL) (black bar). Expression of EMT factors was expressed relative to ZEB1, which was set at 100. At least 3 independent experiments were done, or ≥ 3 values were used for an unpaired t test of statistical significance. P values are reported in Supplemental Table 16. ***P ≤ 0.001, **P ≤ 0.01.

Copyright © 2026 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN 2379-3708

Sign up for email alerts