Go to The Journal of Clinical Investigation
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Journal stats
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
  • Physician-Scientist Development
  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • By specialty
    • COVID-19
    • Cardiology
    • Immunology
    • Metabolism
    • Nephrology
    • Oncology
    • Pulmonology
    • All ...
  • Videos
  • Collections
    • In-Press Preview
    • Resource and Technical Advances
    • Clinical Research and Public Health
    • Research Letters
    • Editorials
    • Perspectives
    • Physician-Scientist Development
    • Reviews
    • Top read articles

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Specialties
  • In-Press Preview
  • Resource and Technical Advances
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Research Letters
  • Editorials
  • Perspectives
  • Physician-Scientist Development
  • Reviews
  • Top read articles
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Journal stats
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
EZH2 deletion does not affect acinar regeneration but restricts progression to pancreatic cancer in mice
Emilie Jaune-Pons, Xiaoyi Wang, Fatemeh Mousavi, Zachary Klassen, Abdessamad El Kaoutari, Kurt Berger, Charis Johnson, Mickenzie B. Martin, Saloni Aggarwal, Sukhman Brar, Muhammad Khalid, Joanna F. Ryan, Parisa Shooshtari, Angela J. Mathison, Nelson Dusetti, Raul Urrutia, Gwen Lomberk, Christopher L. Pin
Emilie Jaune-Pons, Xiaoyi Wang, Fatemeh Mousavi, Zachary Klassen, Abdessamad El Kaoutari, Kurt Berger, Charis Johnson, Mickenzie B. Martin, Saloni Aggarwal, Sukhman Brar, Muhammad Khalid, Joanna F. Ryan, Parisa Shooshtari, Angela J. Mathison, Nelson Dusetti, Raul Urrutia, Gwen Lomberk, Christopher L. Pin
View: Text | PDF
Research Article Oncology

EZH2 deletion does not affect acinar regeneration but restricts progression to pancreatic cancer in mice

  • Text
  • PDF
Abstract

Enhancer of zeste homologue 2 (EZH2) is part of the Polycomb Repressor Complex 2, which promotes trimethylation of lysine 27 on histone 3 (H3K27me3) and gene repression. EZH2 is overexpressed in many cancers, and studies in mice attributed both prooncogenic and tumor suppressive functions to EZH2 in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). EZH2 deletion enhances de novo KRAS-driven neoplasia following pancreatic injury, while increased EZH2 expression in patients with PDAC is correlated to poor prognosis, suggesting a context-dependant effect for EZH2 in PDAC progression. In this study, we examined EZH2 in pre- and early neoplastic stages of PDAC. Using an inducible model to delete the SET domain of EZH2 in adult acinar cells (EZH2ΔSET), we showed that loss of EZH2 activity did not prevent acinar cell regeneration in the absence of oncogenic KRAS (KRASG12D) nor did it increase PanIN formation following KRASG12D activation in adult mice. Loss of EZH2 did reduce recruitment of inflammatory cells and, when combined with a more aggressive PDAC model, promoted widespread PDAC progression and remodeling of the tumor microenvironment. This study suggests that expression of EZH2 in adult acinar cells restricts PDAC initiation and progression by affecting both the tumor microenvironment and acinar cell differentiation.

Authors

Emilie Jaune-Pons, Xiaoyi Wang, Fatemeh Mousavi, Zachary Klassen, Abdessamad El Kaoutari, Kurt Berger, Charis Johnson, Mickenzie B. Martin, Saloni Aggarwal, Sukhman Brar, Muhammad Khalid, Joanna F. Ryan, Parisa Shooshtari, Angela J. Mathison, Nelson Dusetti, Raul Urrutia, Gwen Lomberk, Christopher L. Pin

×

Figure 4

EZH2 deletion alters immune cell infiltration promoted by KRASG12D after acute cerulein treatment.

Options: View larger image (or click on image) Download as PowerPoint
EZH2 deletion alters immune cell infiltration promoted by KRASG12D after...
(A) KEGG pathway analysis of DEGs between KRASG12D and KRASG12DEzh2ΔSET pancreatic tissue 22 days after tamoxifen treatment. Bars indicate the FDR values, while black dots indicate the number of genes associated with each pathway. (B) K27me3, K4me3, and RNA tracks showing bivalency and differential K27me3 enrichment between KRASG12D and control or KRASG12DEzh2ΔSET at Cd1d2. Red asterisks indicate K27me3 enrichment specific to KRASG12D mice. Tracks are an overlay of n = 3 mice. (C and D) IHC for CD3, CD8, and F4/80 (C) or IF for CD4+ cells (D) in pancreatic tissue from KRASG12D and KRASG12DEzh2ΔSET mice 51 days after expressing KRASG12D and 35 days following cerulein treatment. Scale bar: 100 μm. Box plots compare the mean number of positive cells, and individual values (n = 5 mice per condition) are included. Data are shown as mean ± minimum to maximum. Significance was measured using a 2-tailed unpaired Mann-Whitney U test. **P ≤ 0.01. (E) Representative images of IHC for vimentin or α-SMA staining on pancreatic tissue. Scale bar: 100 μm.

Copyright © 2026 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN 2379-3708

Sign up for email alerts