Go to The Journal of Clinical Investigation
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Journal stats
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
  • Physician-Scientist Development
  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • By specialty
    • COVID-19
    • Cardiology
    • Immunology
    • Metabolism
    • Nephrology
    • Oncology
    • Pulmonology
    • All ...
  • Videos
  • Collections
    • In-Press Preview
    • Resource and Technical Advances
    • Clinical Research and Public Health
    • Research Letters
    • Editorials
    • Perspectives
    • Physician-Scientist Development
    • Reviews
    • Top read articles

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Specialties
  • In-Press Preview
  • Resource and Technical Advances
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Research Letters
  • Editorials
  • Perspectives
  • Physician-Scientist Development
  • Reviews
  • Top read articles
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Journal stats
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
Pivotal roles for cancer cell–intrinsic mPGES-1 and autocrine EP4 signaling in suppressing antitumor immunity
Nune Markosyan, Il-Kyu Kim, Charu Arora, Liz Quinones-Ware, Nikhil Joshi, Noah Cheng, Emma Y. Schechter, John W. Tobias, Joseph E. Hochberg, Emily Corse, Kang Liu, Varenka Rodriguez DiBlasi, Li-Chuan (Eric) Chan, Emer M. Smyth, Garret A. FitzGerald, Ben Z. Stanger, Robert H. Vonderheide
Nune Markosyan, Il-Kyu Kim, Charu Arora, Liz Quinones-Ware, Nikhil Joshi, Noah Cheng, Emma Y. Schechter, John W. Tobias, Joseph E. Hochberg, Emily Corse, Kang Liu, Varenka Rodriguez DiBlasi, Li-Chuan (Eric) Chan, Emer M. Smyth, Garret A. FitzGerald, Ben Z. Stanger, Robert H. Vonderheide
View: Text | PDF
Research Article Immunology Oncology

Pivotal roles for cancer cell–intrinsic mPGES-1 and autocrine EP4 signaling in suppressing antitumor immunity

  • Text
  • PDF
Abstract

Tumor cell–derived prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) is a tumor cell–intrinsic factor that supports immunosuppression in the tumor microenvironment (TME) by acting on the immune cells, but the impact of PGE2 signaling in tumor cells on the immunosuppressive TME is unclear. We demonstrate that deleting the PGE2 synthesis enzyme or disrupting autocrine PGE2 signaling through EP4 receptors on tumor cells reverses the T cell–low, myeloid cell–rich TME, activates T cells, and suppresses tumor growth. Knockout (KO) of Ptges (the gene encoding the PGE2 synthesis enzyme mPGES-1) or the EP4 receptor gene (Ptger4) in KPCY (KrasG12D P53R172H Yfp CrePdx) pancreatic tumor cells abolished growth of implanted tumors in a T cell–dependent manner. Blockade of the EP4 receptor in combination with immunotherapy, but not immunotherapy alone, induced complete tumor regressions and immunological memory. Mechanistically, Ptges- and Ptger4-KO tumor cells exhibited altered T and myeloid cell attractant chemokines, became more susceptible to TNF-α–induced killing, and exhibited reduced adenosine synthesis. In hosts treated with an adenosine deaminase inhibitor, Ptger4-KO tumor cells accumulated adenosine and gave rise to tumors. These studies reveal an unexpected finding — a nonredundant role for the autocrine mPGES-1/PGE2/EP4 signaling axis in pancreatic cancer cells, further nominating mPGES-1 inhibition and EP4 blockade as immune-sensitizing therapy in cancer.

Authors

Nune Markosyan, Il-Kyu Kim, Charu Arora, Liz Quinones-Ware, Nikhil Joshi, Noah Cheng, Emma Y. Schechter, John W. Tobias, Joseph E. Hochberg, Emily Corse, Kang Liu, Varenka Rodriguez DiBlasi, Li-Chuan (Eric) Chan, Emer M. Smyth, Garret A. FitzGerald, Ben Z. Stanger, Robert H. Vonderheide

×

Figure 4

Pharmacological inhibition of PGE2 signaling sensitizes tumors to immunotherapy and chemotherapy.

Options: View larger image (or click on image) Download as PowerPoint
Pharmacological inhibition of PGE2 signaling sensitizes tumors to immuno...
(A) Released cAMP measured by ELISA in culture media of TI 4662 MD7 PDAC clonal cell line treated either with vehicle (control) or 1 nM and 10 nM EP4 antagonist ONO-AE3-208 (αEP4) for 48 hours (n = 3). (B) S.c. implanted 4662 MD7 tumor volume change with and without indicated treatments, 41 days after implantation compared to the volume at the start of the treatment (each bar represents a tumor). (C) Individual tumor growth curves of the tumors in A, before and after rechallenges. The black vertical arrow indicates treatment start, blue arrows indicate first and second rechallenges on days 62 and 136, and horizontal black arrows indicate the period host mice were depleted of T cells (n = 5–8 initial implant, n = 12 rechallenge group: 2, 2, and 8 cured mice from αEP4, αPD-1+aCD40, and αEP4+αPD-1+aCD40 groups, respectively). (D) Postenrollment survival of KPC and KPCY mice with indicated treatments. Data are presented as median (A), individual columns (B), and in C, each line represents individual tumors. Significance was assessed by ordinary 1-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple-comparison test (A). *P < 0.05; ***P < 0.001.

Copyright © 2026 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN 2379-3708

Sign up for email alerts