Go to The Journal of Clinical Investigation
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Journal stats
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
  • Physician-Scientist Development
  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • By specialty
    • COVID-19
    • Cardiology
    • Immunology
    • Metabolism
    • Nephrology
    • Oncology
    • Pulmonology
    • All ...
  • Videos
  • Collections
    • In-Press Preview
    • Resource and Technical Advances
    • Clinical Research and Public Health
    • Research Letters
    • Editorials
    • Perspectives
    • Physician-Scientist Development
    • Reviews
    • Top read articles

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Specialties
  • In-Press Preview
  • Resource and Technical Advances
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Research Letters
  • Editorials
  • Perspectives
  • Physician-Scientist Development
  • Reviews
  • Top read articles
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Journal stats
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
Endothelial GSDMD underlies LPS-induced systemic vascular injury and lethality
Enyong Su, Xiaoyue Song, Lili Wei, Junqiang Xue, Xuelin Cheng, Shiyao Xie, Hong Jiang, Ming Liu
Enyong Su, Xiaoyue Song, Lili Wei, Junqiang Xue, Xuelin Cheng, Shiyao Xie, Hong Jiang, Ming Liu
View: Text | PDF
Research Article Immunology Infectious disease

Endothelial GSDMD underlies LPS-induced systemic vascular injury and lethality

  • Text
  • PDF
Abstract

Endothelial injury destroys endothelial barrier integrity, triggering organ dysfunction and ultimately resulting in sepsis-related death. Considerable attention has been focused on identifying effective targets for inhibiting damage to endothelial cells to treat endotoxemia-induced septic shock. Global gasdermin D (Gsdmd) deletion reportedly prevents death caused by endotoxemia. However, the role of endothelial GSDMD in endothelial injury and lethality in lipopolysaccharide-induced (LPS-induced) endotoxemia and the underlying regulatory mechanisms are unknown. Here, we show that LPS increases endothelial GSDMD level in aortas and lung microvessels. We demonstrated that endothelial Gsdmd deficiency, but not myeloid cell Gsdmd deletion, protects against endothelial injury and death in mice with endotoxemia or sepsis. In vivo experiments suggested that hepatocyte GSDMD mediated the release of high-mobility group box 1, which subsequently binds to the receptor for advanced glycation end products in endothelial cells to cause systemic vascular injury, ultimately resulting in acute lung injury and lethality in shock driven by endotoxemia or sepsis. Additionally, inhibiting endothelial GSDMD activation via a polypeptide inhibitor alleviated endothelial damage and improved survival in a mouse model of endotoxemia or sepsis. These data suggest that endothelial GSDMD is a viable pharmaceutical target for treating endotoxemia and endotoxemia-induced sepsis.

Authors

Enyong Su, Xiaoyue Song, Lili Wei, Junqiang Xue, Xuelin Cheng, Shiyao Xie, Hong Jiang, Ming Liu

×

Figure 4

Hepatocyte GSDMD-mediated HMGB1 release regulates vascular injury and death in endotoxemia.

Options: View larger image (or click on image) Download as PowerPoint
Hepatocyte GSDMD-mediated HMGB1 release regulates vascular injury and de...
Gsdmdfl/flAlbCre/+ mice and Gsdmdfl/fl mice were intraperitoneally injected with LPS (17.5 mg/kg). The vehicle control or rHMGB1 protein was subsequently administered intravenously at a dose of 5 μg at 2, 16, 28, and 40 hours after LPS injection. (A) Mouse survival was assessed on the indicated days and is shown as a Kaplan-Meier plot. n = 10 per group. A log-rank (Mantel-Cox) test was used to compare survival curves. Gsdmdfl/fl AlbCre/+ mice and Gsdmdfl/fl mice were intraperitoneally injected with LPS (17.5 mg/kg) or PBS. Then, vehicle control or 5 μg of rHMGB1 protein was administered intravenously at 2 and 16 hours, and the blood, aortas, and lungs were excised from the mice and analyzed. (B) The plasma IL-1β level was determined. n = 6 per group. (C) H&E staining of the lung sections. The scale bar represents 200 μm. (D) The lung wet/dry ratio was quantitatively analyzed. n = 6 per group. (E) Lung microvascular permeability was determined by an Evans blue–albumin extravasation assay. (F) The contents of the extracted lung Evans blue dye were quantified. n = 6 per group. (G) Aortic permeability was determined by an Evans blue–albumin extravasation assay. (H) The aortic Evans blue dye content was quantitatively analyzed. n = 6 per group. The data are expressed as the means ± SEMs. The data were analyzed by 2-way ANOVA with Bonferroni’s post hoc correction. (I) Coimmunofluorescence staining of CD31 (red), GSDMD (green), and DAPI (blue) in aortas. The scale bar represents 20 μm. All the data shown are representative of a minimum of 3 independent experiments. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001.

Copyright © 2026 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN 2379-3708

Sign up for email alerts