Go to The Journal of Clinical Investigation
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Journal stats
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
  • Physician-Scientist Development
  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • By specialty
    • COVID-19
    • Cardiology
    • Immunology
    • Metabolism
    • Nephrology
    • Oncology
    • Pulmonology
    • All ...
  • Videos
  • Collections
    • In-Press Preview
    • Resource and Technical Advances
    • Clinical Research and Public Health
    • Research Letters
    • Editorials
    • Perspectives
    • Physician-Scientist Development
    • Reviews
    • Top read articles

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Specialties
  • In-Press Preview
  • Resource and Technical Advances
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Research Letters
  • Editorials
  • Perspectives
  • Physician-Scientist Development
  • Reviews
  • Top read articles
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Journal stats
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
Macrophage-derived Fgl2 dampens antitumor immunity through regulation of FcγRIIB+CD8+ T cells in melanoma
Kelsey B. Bennion, Julia Miranda R.Bazzano, Danya Liu, Maylene Wagener, Chrystal M. Paulos, Mandy L. Ford
Kelsey B. Bennion, Julia Miranda R.Bazzano, Danya Liu, Maylene Wagener, Chrystal M. Paulos, Mandy L. Ford
View: Text | PDF
Research Article Immunology Oncology

Macrophage-derived Fgl2 dampens antitumor immunity through regulation of FcγRIIB+CD8+ T cells in melanoma

  • Text
  • PDF
Abstract

Cancer immunotherapy has emerged as a promising therapeutic modality but heterogeneity in patient responsiveness remains. Thus, greater understanding of the immunologic factors that dictate response to immunotherapy is critical to improve patient outcomes. Here, we show that fibrinogen-like protein 2 (Fgl2) is elevated in the setting of melanoma in humans and mice and plays a functional role in inhibiting the CD8+ T cell response. Surprisingly, the tumor itself is not the major cellular source of Fgl2. Instead, we found that macrophage-secreted Fgl2 dampens the CD8+ T cell response through binding and apoptosis of FcγRIIB+CD8+ T cells. This regulation was CD8+ T cell autonomous and not via an antigen-presenting cell intermediary, as absence of Fcgr2b from the CD8+ T cells rendered T cells insensitive to Fgl2 regulation. Fgl2 is robustly expressed by macrophages in 10 cancer types in humans and in 6 syngeneic tumor models in mice, underscoring the clinical relevance of Fgl2 as a therapeutic target to promote T cell activity and improve patient immunotherapeutic response.

Authors

Kelsey B. Bennion, Julia Miranda R.Bazzano, Danya Liu, Maylene Wagener, Chrystal M. Paulos, Mandy L. Ford

×

Figure 3

Fgl2 selectively regulates WT but not Fcgr2b–/– tumor-specific CD8+ T cells in vivo.

Options: View larger image (or click on image) Download as PowerPoint
Fgl2 selectively regulates WT but not Fcgr2b–/– tumor-specific CD8+ T ce...
(A) Schematic wherein WT or Fgl2–/– mice were given WT and Fcgr2b–/– OT-I CD8+ T cells at a 1:1 ratio and OT-II CD4+ T cells 1 day prior to cancer cell inoculation. Fourteen days later, tumors were harvested to assess OT-I populations by flow cytometry. (B) Representative flow plot showing day 0 staining of WT (Thy1.1+) and Fcgr2b–/– (Thy1.1+Thy1.2+) OT-I prior to co-adoptive transfer. Representative flow plot and summary data of WT (Thy1.1+) vs. Fcgr2b–/– (Thy1.1+Thy1.2+) OT-I at the tumor of (C) WT (n = 12, pooled data from 2 experiments) vs. (D) Fgl2–/– (n = 8, pooled data from 2 experiments) mice 14 days after tumor challenge. Summary data showing the fold change in cell number of each OT-I subset using the cell number of each OT-I subset in the Fgl2–/– host relative to the WT host in the (E) draining lymph node (dLN), (F) spleen, and (G) tumor. Cells shown were gated on Thy1.1+CD8+ cells. Mann-Whitney nonparametric, unpaired t test was used when comparing 2 groups. Summary data are presented as mean ± SEM. *P < 0.05, ***P < 0.001.

Copyright © 2026 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN 2379-3708

Sign up for email alerts