Go to The Journal of Clinical Investigation
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Journal stats
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
  • Physician-Scientist Development
  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • By specialty
    • COVID-19
    • Cardiology
    • Immunology
    • Metabolism
    • Nephrology
    • Oncology
    • Pulmonology
    • All ...
  • Videos
  • Collections
    • In-Press Preview
    • Resource and Technical Advances
    • Clinical Research and Public Health
    • Research Letters
    • Editorials
    • Perspectives
    • Physician-Scientist Development
    • Reviews
    • Top read articles

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Specialties
  • In-Press Preview
  • Resource and Technical Advances
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Research Letters
  • Editorials
  • Perspectives
  • Physician-Scientist Development
  • Reviews
  • Top read articles
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Journal stats
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
HIF2α inhibits glutaminase clustering in mitochondria to sustain growth of clear cell renal cell carcinoma
Wencao Zhao, Sara M. Demczyszyn, Nathan J. Coffey, Yanqing Jiang, Boyoung Kim, Schuyler Bowers, Caitlyn Bowman, Michael C. Noji, Cholsoon Jang, M. Celeste Simon, Zoltan Arany, Boa Kim
Wencao Zhao, Sara M. Demczyszyn, Nathan J. Coffey, Yanqing Jiang, Boyoung Kim, Schuyler Bowers, Caitlyn Bowman, Michael C. Noji, Cholsoon Jang, M. Celeste Simon, Zoltan Arany, Boa Kim
View: Text | PDF
Research Article Cell biology Metabolism

HIF2α inhibits glutaminase clustering in mitochondria to sustain growth of clear cell renal cell carcinoma

  • Text
  • PDF
Abstract

Clear cell renal cell carcinomas (ccRCCs) are largely driven by HIF2α and are avid consumers of glutamine. However, inhibitors of glutaminase 1 (GLS1), the first step in glutaminolysis, have not shown benefit in phase III trials, and HIF2α inhibition, recently FDA approved for treatment of ccRCC, shows significant but incomplete benefits. This highlights the need to better understand the interplay between glutamine metabolism and HIF2α in ccRCC. Here, we report that glutamine deprivation rapidly redistributed GLS1 into isolated clusters within mitochondria in diverse cell types, but not in ccRCC. GLS1 clustering occurred rapidly within 1–3 hours, was reversible, was specifically triggered by reduced intracellular glutamate, and was dependent on mitochondrial fission. Clustered GLS1 markedly enhanced glutaminase activity and promoted cell death under glutamine-deprived conditions. HIF2α prevented GLS1 clustering, independently of its transcriptional activity, thereby maintaining low GLS activity and protecting ccRCC cells from glutamine-deprivation-induced cell death. Forced clustering of GLS1, using constitutively clustering mutants, restored high GLS activity, promoted apoptosis, and suppressed ccRCC tumor growth in vivo. These findings reveal multiple insights into cellular glutamine handling, including a previously unrecognized process by which HIF2α promotes ccRCC: by suppressing GLS1 clustering and maintaining low GLS activity. This mechanism provides a potential explanation for the lack of clinical efficacy of GLS inhibitors in ccRCC and suggests a therapeutic avenue to combine HIF2α inhibition with strategies that restore GLS1 clustering.

Authors

Wencao Zhao, Sara M. Demczyszyn, Nathan J. Coffey, Yanqing Jiang, Boyoung Kim, Schuyler Bowers, Caitlyn Bowman, Michael C. Noji, Cholsoon Jang, M. Celeste Simon, Zoltan Arany, Boa Kim

×

Figure 8

Promoting GLS1 clustering in UMRC2 suppresses tumorigenesis.

Options: View larger image (or click on image) Download as PowerPoint
Promoting GLS1 clustering in UMRC2 suppresses tumorigenesis.
(A) Schemat...
(A) Schematic of the UMRC2 injection study. Each nude mouse received subcutaneous injections of 10 million UMRC2 cells overexpressing either WT GLS or K320A GLS1 into their left and right flanks, respectively. (B) Reduced tumor growth in K320A-overexpressing UMRC2. Photo of all dissected tumors: WT on the upper panel and K320A on the lower panel, n = 8 for each group. (C) Average tumor volume (mm3) in WT versus K320A GLS1–overexpressing UMRC2 during the 12-week monitoring period. Black circles: WT; red circles: K320A. (D) Pair-matched plot of tumor volume (mm3) in WT versus K320A GLS1–overexpressing UMRC2 in each mouse. (E) Plot of tumor weight (mg) in WT versus K320A GLS1–overexpressing UMRC2 in each mouse. (F) Confirmation of GLS1 clustering in K320A-overexpressing UMRC2 tumor. Left panel depicts the representative confocal images. Right panel shows the quantification of GLS1 clustering. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ****P < 0.0001 by paired sample, 2-tailed Student’s t test. (G) Increased apoptosis in K320A-overexpressing UMRC2 tumor. Scale bars: 2 μm (F) and 50 μm (G). Inset magnification, ×6. (H) Schematic of the model.

Copyright © 2026 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN 2379-3708

Sign up for email alerts