Go to The Journal of Clinical Investigation
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Journal stats
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
  • Physician-Scientist Development
  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • By specialty
    • COVID-19
    • Cardiology
    • Immunology
    • Metabolism
    • Nephrology
    • Oncology
    • Pulmonology
    • All ...
  • Videos
  • Collections
    • In-Press Preview
    • Resource and Technical Advances
    • Clinical Research and Public Health
    • Research Letters
    • Editorials
    • Perspectives
    • Physician-Scientist Development
    • Reviews
    • Top read articles

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Specialties
  • In-Press Preview
  • Resource and Technical Advances
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Research Letters
  • Editorials
  • Perspectives
  • Physician-Scientist Development
  • Reviews
  • Top read articles
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Journal stats
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
Emerin is an effector of oncogenic KRAS-driven nuclear dynamics in pancreatic cancer
Luis F. Flores, David L. Marks, Renzo E. Vera, Ashley N. Sigafoos, Ezequiel J. Tolosa, Luciana L. Almada, David R. Pease, Merih D. Toruner, Brian Chang, Brooke R. Tader, Kayla C. LaRue-Nolan, Ryan M. Carr, Rondell P. Graham, Catherine E. Hagen, Matthew R. Brown, Aleksey V. Matveyenko, Katherine L. Wilson, David W. Dawson, Christopher L. Pin, Kyle J. Roux, Martin E. Fernandez-Zapico
Luis F. Flores, David L. Marks, Renzo E. Vera, Ashley N. Sigafoos, Ezequiel J. Tolosa, Luciana L. Almada, David R. Pease, Merih D. Toruner, Brian Chang, Brooke R. Tader, Kayla C. LaRue-Nolan, Ryan M. Carr, Rondell P. Graham, Catherine E. Hagen, Matthew R. Brown, Aleksey V. Matveyenko, Katherine L. Wilson, David W. Dawson, Christopher L. Pin, Kyle J. Roux, Martin E. Fernandez-Zapico
View: Text | PDF
Research Article Cell biology Oncology

Emerin is an effector of oncogenic KRAS-driven nuclear dynamics in pancreatic cancer

  • Text
  • PDF
Abstract

For over a century, scientists reported the disruption of normal nuclear shape and size in cancer. These changes have long been used as tools for diagnosis and staging of malignancies. However, to date, the mechanisms underlying these aberrant nuclear phenotypes and their biological significance remain poorly understood. Using a model of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), the major histological subtypes of pancreatic cancer, we found that oncogenic mutant KRAS reduces nuclear size. Transcriptomic and protein expression analysis of mutant KRAS–expressing PDAC cells revealed differential levels of several nuclear envelope–associated genes. Further analysis demonstrated the nuclear lamina protein, Emerin (EMD), acted downstream of KRAS to mediate nuclear size reduction in PDAC. Analysis of human PDAC samples showed that increased EMD expression associates with reduced nuclear size. Finally, in vivo genetic depletion of EMD in a mutant KRAS–driven PDAC model resulted in increased nuclear size and a reduced incidence of poorly differentiated PDAC. Thus, our data provide evidence of a potentially novel mechanism underlying nuclear size regulation and its effect in PDAC carcinogenesis.

Authors

Luis F. Flores, David L. Marks, Renzo E. Vera, Ashley N. Sigafoos, Ezequiel J. Tolosa, Luciana L. Almada, David R. Pease, Merih D. Toruner, Brian Chang, Brooke R. Tader, Kayla C. LaRue-Nolan, Ryan M. Carr, Rondell P. Graham, Catherine E. Hagen, Matthew R. Brown, Aleksey V. Matveyenko, Katherine L. Wilson, David W. Dawson, Christopher L. Pin, Kyle J. Roux, Martin E. Fernandez-Zapico

×

Figure 4

EMD is an effector of nuclear size change downstream of oncogenic KRAS in vivo.

Options: View larger image (or click on image) Download as PowerPoint
EMD is an effector of nuclear size change downstream of oncogenic KRAS i...
(A) Schematic representing animal crosses to generate Ptf1a-Cre, LSL-KrasG12D, Trp53+/–, EMD+/–, or EMD–/– (KPCE) mice using Ptf1a-Cre, LSL-KrasG12D, or Trp53+/– (KPC) with EMD+/– or EMD–/– mice. (B) Pancreatic tissue confirmation of EMD recombination. WT = 349 bp, Emd+/– = 349/490 bp, Emd–/– = 490 bp. (C) qPCR of Emd expression relative to mPrt/Tbp in pancreata from KPC (n = 4), KPCE+/– (n = 3), and KPCE–/– (n = 9) mice. Scatter dot plot: mean ± SEM. Significant difference was determined by ANOVA, followed by Tukey’s multiple-comparison test. (D) Western blot of mice pancreas for EMD protein level with α-tubulin loading control. (E) H&E-stained pancreatic tumors from KPC, KPCE+/–, and KPCE–/– mice. Scale bar: 50 μm. IHC staining of EMD; arrow heads indicate positive EMD expression. Scale bar: 200 μm. (F) Quantification of nuclear CSA from H&E-stained pancreatic tumors from KPC, KPCE+/–,, and KPCE–/– mice (KPC n = 456,858 nuclei; KPCE+/– n = 572,027 nuclei; KPCE–/– n = 451,757 nuclei). Violin plot: median ± interquartile range. Significant difference was determined by Kruskal-Wallis test, followed by Dunn’s multiple-comparison test. (G) Histopathological analysis of KPC (n = 11) and KPCE–/– (n = 16) pancreatic tumors. (H) H&E and IHC staining of EMD in moderately and poorly differentiated human PDAC samples, and quantification of EMD intensity by grade. Moderately differentiated PDAC nuclei = 47,963 from n = 22 cases, poorly differentiated PDAC nuclei = 50,056 nuclei from n = 15 cases. Scale bar: 80 μm. Violin plot: median ± interquartile range. Significant difference was determined by Mann Whitney U test.

Copyright © 2026 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN 2379-3708

Sign up for email alerts