Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb) survives within multiple macrophage populations during infection, including alveolar macrophages (AMs) and recruited inflammatory macrophages. In mice, itaconate, produced in macrophages by ACOD1-mediated decarboxylation of aconitate, has direct antimicrobial activity, modulates inflammatory cytokines, and is required for resistance to Mtb infection. The role of itaconate in human macrophages is less clear, and it is unknown whether itaconate mediates distinct effects in macrophage subtypes. Here, we investigated the role of itaconate in macrophages derived from human induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs), induced by either GM-CSF to resemble AMs (AM-like cells, hereafter ipAM-Ls) or M-CSF to resemble monocyte-derived macrophages (MDM-like cells, hereafter ipMDM-Ls). Both human macrophage types produced substantially less itaconate than mouse macrophages, and ipAM-Ls produced 4-fold less itaconate than ipMDM-Ls. Surprisingly, ACOD1-deficient ipAM-Ls, but not ipMDM-Ls, were permissive for Mtb growth. Moreover, itaconate functioned to dampen the Mtb-induced inflammatory response in ipMDM-Ls, but not ipAM-Ls, affecting both the type I IFN and TNF pathways. These results indicate that itaconate is involved in human macrophage responses to tuberculosis, with distinct roles in different macrophage subsets. These results also show that genetically tractable iPSC-derived macrophages are a useful model to dissect cellular host-pathogen interactions in human macrophages.
Adam S. Krebs, Tomi Lazarov, Anthony T. Reynolds, Kimberly A. Dill-McFarland, Abigail Xie, James M. Bean, Muxue Du, Olivier Levy, John A. Buglino, Aaron Zhong, Anna-Lena Neehus, Stéphanie Boisson-Dupuis, Jean-Laurent Casanova, Elouise E. Kroon, Marlo Möller, Thomas R. Hawn, Ting Zhou, Lydia W.S. Finley, Marc Antoine Jean Juste, Dan W. Fitzgerald, Frederic Geissmann, Michael S. Glickman
Usage data is cumulative from March 2026 through June 2026.
| Usage | JCI | PMC |
|---|---|---|
| Text version | 1,848 | 0 |
| 359 | 0 | |
| Figure | 914 | 0 |
| Table | 79 | 0 |
| Supplemental data | 286 | 0 |
| Citation downloads | 160 | 0 |
| Totals | 3,646 | 0 |
| Total Views | 3,646 | |
Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.
Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.